should i play half life or half life source

Should i play half life or half life source Pc#
Should i play half life or half life source series#
Should i play half life or half life source ps2#
Should i play half life or half life source free#

That was like every single FPS before Half Life! A slow build up to the action is standard practice these days, and that's my point. surprised him because the game started by instantly throwing you into the action. I want to say Ryan Davis was saying that F.3.A.R.

The fact that you started up the game and your objective was to go to work, or you didn't encounter combat until the first chapter was over was mind-blowing. I'd like to be wrong but the way I see it the reason people like myself have those warm nostalgic feelings about a 'Half Life' or whatever game of choice is because they did magical things that no one had seen before.

It's a noble goal, sure, but I feel an impossible one. My main point is responding to the idea of playing a classic for the first time, and I don't think it's a good one. I remember saying to myself 'I hope BM:S comes out before episode 3 so I can go through them all in sequence.' That was probably 3 years ago and neither of them are in sight yet.īut while I thought I'd share that little tidbit it's not why I replied. Ultimately I can't really see myself getting it any time soon because of my backlog of games but I feel I should play it some time since it's such a classic and constantly gets I was kidding, but at the same time I am waiting for it to come out so I can do the Half Life marathon I planned on doing in preparation for Ep 3. I'm now thinking that probably one of the big reasons for me to play it is to understand why other people loved it so much and to share that experience with them and that would kind of lean me towards getting the original so that I get this same experience. I'm not 100% sure but I think I may have changed my opinion about the way I would want to experience HL. It passed through my mind just recently whether I should reevaluate that decision and also in that case if I should get the original or Source version of Half-Life - so I'm glad to see this thread. gonn happen, serious.You jest, but on hearing about Black Mesa about 2 years ago and reading an interview with one of those guys I made the decision then to hold off on buying and playing Half-Life and waiting till BM came out. And Decay is actually an exclusive, unlike Blue Shift that has been ported elsewhere (PC).Comeon the answer is obviously Black Mesa: Source guys, ya just. The Dreamcast build going around was supposedly never optimized, which leads to a fairly low fps and more inconsistency due to not being the final build.

Should i play half life or half life source ps2#

And the frame rate is smoother and more consistent on the PS2 release. The textures have also been refined further and the character models have a higher polygon count over the Dreamcast version. The dual analog stick is far better for the game then the single analog stick of the DC controller.

The PS2 version also supports any USB mouse and keyboard and not just Dreamcast accessories. The saving is much more efficient space wise with the PS2 release and was never refined on the Dreamcast build everyone has. The saving also isn't screwed up like on the Dreamcast when sometimes the VMU won't even be large enough for a save.

Sorry, but there's a massive improvement in load times for Half-Life on the PS2 release compared to the Dreamcast build, both in terms of length of save time and how numerous the saves are.

Should i play half life or half life source series#

And if you're a Mac user, I hear the entire Half-Life series will be coming to Mac users pretty soon as well.

Should i play half life or half life source Pc#

It's an amazing game and my favorite first person shooter, and both expansions are also excellent and worth playing through before moving on to Half-Life 2 and it's various episodes.Īnd any PC that virtually anyone is using for day to day use in 2010 can pretty much easily run it maxed out. In all honestly though, if you want the superior experience and really want to play through the Half-Life saga, spend the $10 or so that Half-Life 1, Blue Shift, and Opposing Forces (Which isn't available on consoles) costs on Steam and play through it there. And it has the only console version of Blue Shift, a nice expansion pack that Half-Life recieved (Which was actually created first for the Dreamcast and only later ported to the PC).

Should i play half life or half life source free#

The only reason to burn Half-Life to cd-r to play on your Dreamcast is because it's free and neat to check it out. It isn't just a cooperative mode for Half-Life, it's a unique expansion pack with it's own storyline telling the story of two scientist, much like Blue Shift and Opposing Forces were. Also has the cooperative game of Decay, the only part of the Half-Life saga that PC owners never recieved (Although there's a homebrew remake of it available for PC). Superior controls due to twin analog sticks, faster frame rate, sharper and more detailed graphics, faster loading times, and more efficient saving. The PS2 port is better then the Dreamcast port.